{"id":7904,"date":"2013-03-04T11:00:40","date_gmt":"2013-03-04T17:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.confabulatorcafe.com\/?p=7904"},"modified":"2013-03-04T11:00:40","modified_gmt":"2013-03-04T17:00:40","slug":"consider-the-source","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.confabulatorcafe.com\/?p=7904","title":{"rendered":"Consider the Source"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Critique and rejection are two entirely different things, though one can sometimes accompany the other. If you\u2019re broadcasting your work in any sort of way, you\u2019ll inevitably encounter both. As you do, it\u2019s important to consider both the message (the reason behind the critique or rejection) and the messenger (the person providing the feedback).<\/p>\n<p>Not all critiques are created equal. Sometimes you will find yourself in a group with writers of varying skill levels, and there may be times when you are encouraged to swap pages with people whom you know you can flat out write circles around. That\u2019s not arrogance. That\u2019s honesty.<\/p>\n<p>As I mentioned in a previous post, if you\u2019re the one providing feedback, you should take into account the abilities of the author of the work you\u2019re critiquing. Not everyone is ready for the same level of discourse.<\/p>\n<p>The same goes when you\u2019re the one receiving the critique. Sometimes an author who is early in his or her writing journey will not be very good at assessing another person\u2019s work. Inevitably there are long discussions about word choice or the comma police have made your manuscript look like a crime scene. Sometimes the inexperienced author \u201cjust\u00a0didn&#8217;t\u00a0get\u201d what you were trying to do or say and they will be inadvertently harsh in their criticisms, without any specific reasons for why they\u00a0didn&#8217;t\u00a0like it.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->When it comes to all of these, and\u00a0I&#8217;ve\u00a0been on the receiving end of every one of these types of criticisms, I encourage you to not take it personally. If you encounter a critique that you feel is way off base, move on as quickly as possible. Dwelling on the encounter\u00a0doesn&#8217;t\u00a0do anyone any favors.<\/p>\n<p>My personal approach is to nod, say something innocuous like \u201cI\u00a0hadn&#8217;t\u00a0thought of it that way,\u201d and thank them for the feedback.<\/p>\n<p>Now before we get any further, please don\u2019t misinterpret what I\u2019m saying. I\u2019m not encouraging you to disregard every critique you disagree with. Often there will be things you\u00a0hadn&#8217;t\u00a0considered or glaring holes in your plot that you somehow missed. Heed those warnings, especially if you hear the same concerns raised by more than one beta reader.<\/p>\n<p>All I\u2019m saying is that not every piece of feedback you receive will be valid. Be aware of the skill of the writers in your group, and weigh their comments accordingly.<\/p>\n<p>When it comes to facing rejection, in addition to considering the messenger, you must also ask yourself what part you played in the negative response. (In this instance, I\u2019m equating negative to a \u201cwe\u2019re not going to publish this\u201d response.)<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes you\u2019ll get rejected because you\u00a0didn&#8217;t\u00a0target the right kind of publication for your story. If a magazine is looking for cozy mysteries, don\u2019t send them thrillers. If there is a strict 1,000 word limit, don\u2019t send them your 3,000 word fantasy tale. Those type of rejections are on you, and you\u2019re probably looking at a form letter, or in some cases, no response at all.<\/p>\n<p>In other instances, your story might fit the particular focus of a magazine but for whatever reason it\u00a0didn&#8217;t\u00a0resonate with every decision maker on the editorial board. That\u2019s the objective nature of readers biting you in the ass there, and there\u2019s nothing you can do about it except try again. If you\u2019re lucky and\u00a0you&#8217;ve\u00a0put together a well-written and engaging story, someone at that publication will drop you a personal note.<\/p>\n<p>If you must get rejected, this is the way to go. Not only is it encouraging to receive positive comments on a story that\u00a0didn&#8217;t\u00a0quite make the cut, but it\u2019s also validation that you\u2019re at least meeting the standards of what they\u2019re looking for.<\/p>\n<p>I recently submitted to a magazine that I fully expected to reject me. I was right. They did. But I got a little bonus for my efforts. The managing editor wrote me a note, the gist of which was: You\u2019re funny. Send more, please. (The last three words are taken verbatim.)<\/p>\n<p>That note made my day, and I\u2019m working on something new for them now. It gave me a reason to keep going, even though the initial purpose of the letter was to reject the pieced I\u2019d submitted.<\/p>\n<p>Just like critiques, not every rejection is created equal. Some will lift you up, some will give you nothing, and some will let you know that you\u2019re not quite ready for prime time. Whatever the message, remember to consider the source and don\u2019t take anything personal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Critique and rejection are two entirely different things, though one can sometimes accompany the other. If you\u2019re broadcasting your work in any sort of way, you\u2019ll inevitably encounter both. As you do, it\u2019s important to consider both the message (the reason behind the critique or rejection) and the messenger (the person providing the feedback). Not [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[239,921],"class_list":["post-7904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-writers-life","tag-critique","tag-rejection"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.confabulatorcafe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.confabulatorcafe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.confabulatorcafe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.confabulatorcafe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.confabulatorcafe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7904"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.confabulatorcafe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7904\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.confabulatorcafe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.confabulatorcafe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.confabulatorcafe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}